The Word of the Day is...

...is this. Must it be done in reference to others or can it be directed towards oneself? It's been the sort of day for the latter...

So I've decided not to pursue a school media specialist certification/license. Maybe I'll go back for it at some point, but as of now I feel confident that I would prefer to work in a public or nontraditional academic library. The good news-it frees me up to take the tribal libraries, archives, and museums course in the spring, which looks promising. I'm hoping to become engaged with larger issues outside of the literature side of American Indian studies, which is what I've been doing these past few months. The bad news? I have no idea what comes next, then...and seven months is a very short time indeed..."I have no idea where I am going. I do not see the road ahead of me. I cannot know for certain"....

But I do know this...I will never dress a dog like slide 23 of this website that my sister sent me... I couldn't get the image, but I found one quite close...seriously, I hope this is a joke-but I don't think it is. I could deconstruct the many ways that this costume bothers me, but indeed, public mockery might the only healthy response at this point in the night. Seriously? People seriously buy this costume for their animals? **facepalm**

Jamake Highwater

In my research project, one of the authors I'm reading reviews of is Jamake Highwater. I sincerely hope someone writes a book about all of that someday-a media studies/history of print media person would surely find him the perfect subject. I went back and read many of the original interviews and it certainly didn't take a genius to figure out the pieces in his story didn't match up and were changed at his convenience.

I don't want to delve into that too deeply, but since he is still featured on bibliographies of American Indian children's literature, that's the point when I feel compelled to respond. His work isn't condemned just because of his deceit but because it simply isn't good. Is it nostalgia or laziness that keeps him in the public eye? The Newbery honor for Anpao is a big part of that, but certainly that doesn't explain why so many of his other works are still included. I think there is so much else out there right now-time to move on. Of course, I would say the same thing about ...Little Tree but that was just featured on one of the most popular homeschooling blogs as a recommended work. Not to be cynical, but based on the statements of many commenters, I doubt many of these people picked up a book with an American Indian character since. Some brave publishers, writers, and librarians have a lot of work cut out for them...

Speaking of writers, I was talking with a patron about ideas for encouraging teenage Native writers. I spoke with her about many of the oral history projects that have been done, but I like her idea of bringing in Native writers and storytellers to not only speak to young people, but also teachers and education students. I think it's a promising idea for the future, especially on this campus where there is more funding for guest speakers.

Young Adult Fiction

I went over to work this afternoon to pull some books for a patron who asked me about American Indian fiction for young adults. After going through the lists in my files, I came up with a fairly small number of recommended books. If it were picture books, I would have had half a cart instead of such a little stack. The push for multicultural reading in high school curriculum, at its best, skips past young adult literature entirely in favor of Ceremony or Love Medicine (at least in the school in St. Paul where I tutored). I will have to look into this thought more--my initial impression is that it's harder for white researchers to write from the young adult perspective of another culture-it's hard enough to write as an adult in that voice without other differences to consider.
I am hopeful that the success of ...Part-Time Indian will inspire publishers to pursue Native writers for this age group, because otherwise Joseph Bruchac has a near-monopoly and the American Indian characters most teenagers read about will be magical shirtless werewolves.

Late on this one...

I am thinking over some of the thoughts proposed by Jonathan Hunt about who has a right to claim insensitivity. Since I'm working on a project about how reviewers considered the accuracy of books with American Indian content that went on to win the Newbery or Newbery Honor, it's been on my mind this week in a different way. I'm surprised how readily the reviewers accepted author's claims regarding research and tribal affiliation-maybe I come from a more skeptical era. Is that to say I would catch every error in a book myself? Of course not-that's why the reviewing community needs experts who can make these arguments rather than give the general impression of "it seems right" that was the case with many Newbery winners now deemed offensive.

Where I take issue with this post (besides the bringing in of Hitler Youth and the Shoah...I'm not going there although I want to...off topic and ranty...) is when he extends the argument to criticize Reese for not evaluating for content outside of her own area of expertise. No one reviewer can respond to every possible offensive thing in a work-does that mean they lack credibility, then? The Internet has given those seeking reviews such a wonderful chance to gain multiple perspectives-so let those who have objections voice them, provided they can make a well-substantiated argument.

Book of the Week: Lately, we've gotten more works from the Emily Post Etiquette series for toddlers than on American Indians....I wish I was joking......